After reading the first two books
of Pleasure, I was most impacted by the use of symbols throughout the writing.
The objects surrounding the characters in each scene consistently depict the
emotions that are exchanged and aid the reader in understanding the true nature
of the characters. This symbolism, to
me, can be taken even further as a symbol itself of Andrea’s objectifying of
women throughout the entire reading. Objects and the physical world are of
upmost importance to Andrea, and even when he has his spiritual revelation
after his injury, he very quickly resorts back to his previous one-dimensional
thoughts. The use of symbolic scenery also helps the reader distinguish
Andrea’s feelings towards Donna Elena and Donna Maria respectively. In a scene
on page 159, Donna Maria approaches Andrea down the staircase, and he describes
her as moving through trees, emerging behind a rosebush, and throwing leaves at
him. The use of nature depicts Donna
Maria’s innocence and sweetness that Andrea sees in her. Whereas, the objects
surrounding Donna Elena are often more seductive and luxurious, such as on page
88 when it says, “ the Scorpion took hold of her breasts; a great zodiacal
strip of cloth dragged behind her on the carpet, drawing the roses along with
it as it if she had already scattered them.” This scene is much more seductive
and not as pure as Andreas interaction with Donna Maria. My prediction is that although Andrea has
moved from the more objectifying relationship with Donna Elena to a more
innocent relationship with Donna Maria, he will not have a strong enough will
to continue his moral progression. I am
curious how his relationships with the two lovers will intertwine and how
Andrea will handle a potential opportunity to reunite with Donna Elena.
Andrea’s character is most
intriguing to me because as I read the explanations of his thoughts and his
perceptions of his surroundings and the women he is infatuated with, I find
myself hoping that he will eventually change and almost talk himself into feeling
an honest, true love as opposed to an objectifying, fleeting love. It is odd to
me that he admits to objectifying the women and only being capable of
infatuation, not true love. On page 157,
as he is pondering his feelings for Donna Maria, Andrea asks himself, “Do I
love her, then?” The author continues to write, “he feared that delicate
enchantment would disperse and disappear like a dream at dawn.” Andrea knows
his own flaws, yet seems to be content that he is not a genuine lover.
Another character I am drawn to the
character of the marchioness, Andrea’s cousin.
Pages 146-148 include a dialogue between her and Andrea, which is when
the reader has the chance to understand their relationship more in depth. I like this passage from the book because
Andrea interacts with a woman that he doesn’t objectify or think of
sexually. The marchioness is the
character that introduces Andrea to both Donna Elena and Donna Maria. I hope further in the book we are able to
learn more about her role as Andrea’s matchmaker. I am curious as to whether or not she knows
of her cousin’s shallow personality and manipulative nature when she introduces
her female guests to him.
Books 1 and 2 focus mainly on developing
Andrea’s character and telling the story of his relationships with his two
different lovers. I am looking forward
to seeing how the two different relationships develop and the person the Andrea
ultimately becomes as a result of his relationships, and also who is able to
stand strong against his manipulative, dangerous motives.
The claim you make about the relationship between symbols and lovers is very intelligent. I understood the significance that the novel placed on symbolism but I didn't think to tie it back to Andrea's love for objects and women. It is very clear that Andrea and Elena connect on a sexual level while Andrea and Maria connect intellectually, even soulfully. The novel was meant to be read with its surroundings, but which I mean that the placement of objects in a room in which a particular scene can completely change the meaning of that scene. This transfusion of setting and plot is an art of D'Annunzio's.
ReplyDelete