Invisible Cities written by
Italo Calvino takes place in the present with two men, emperor Kublai Khan and
the young Macro Polo, emperor and traveler, are sitting in a garden discussing
the art of traveling and Macro tells the emperor tales of all the cities he has
visited. It is not the short descriptions and anecdotes that Marco shares with
Kublai that matter, but it is how Marco shares of his travels that make a
difference. Calvino writes this novel jumping city to city and then inserts
Kublai and Marco’s discussion in between Marco’s recollection and sharing of
what each city is like. All the descriptions of the cities eventually run
together and the reader is left grouping all these cities into one larger city,
but that in my opinion is the point of Calvino’s novel. It is not the
descriptions of the cities that matter, but the conversation that the two men
have about the descriptions of the cities.
Descriptions
of cities and one’s adventure in them are an individualistic opinion. Macro describes the fourth city by saying,
“Zora’s secret lies in the way your gaze runs over patterns following one
another as in a musical score where not a note can be altered or displaced,”
(15). Each city has a different structure and landscape, a different smell and
different relationships. It’s not these things that matter, but it’s the
visitor’s interpretation of how these things make up this city that matters. While
describing Hypatia Macro says it’s not the words, which are the descriptors of
the city that matter, but it is the things that make up the city that matter
(47). These two cities may be described with different words so they appear to
be different, but this is not what makes the cities two cities. It is instead
the things such as what I listed above that make them their own cities.
Macro also
says, “The city does not consist of this, but of relationships between
measurements of its space and the events of its past,” (10). A city is a city
because of its inhabitants and how time passes and events are associated with
cities. It’s not the city that can tell its past, but the people (11).
Calvino
creates only two characters in this novel and the interactions between them are
short and the rest of the novel is description followed by another description.
What is his point of writing this way, in limiting the characters and just
using descriptions? I think he uses this technique to force the reader to put
emphasis on the interactions between Kublai and Macro instead of on the cities.
The title of this novel is Invisible
Cities, and after finishing the novel it’s not meant to be written
literally about invisible cities but about how each city is different to each
visitor or local. The city exists but as Macro says, “The city exists and it
has a simple secret: it knows only departures, not returns,” (56). People
create a city and make it come to life.
The
descriptions of the cities complete this novel and are necessary, but Polo is
making a specific point that an individual creates the city they live in and
that The Great Khan can still do the same without looking at the atlas time and
time again towards the end of the novel. So, the point becomes how to form and
create a city that is not an inferno but realistically an individual cannot
design one city for everyone.
I agree with you that the parts of the novel that are most significant are the conversations between the two characters. The descriptions of the cities become confusing, and it is difficult to extract a sense of a plot from Calvino's organization. I think that the challenge that Marco faces in describing the cities to Kublai Khan is a challenge that all people face. It is nearly impossible to describe anything with words because the sense of experience and emotion is completely lost to the speaker's audience. This is a main question raised in the novel. Can a place live through a description? Or can it only exist in one's memory of it? Can a place be reduced to its location on an atlas? It is difficult to establish a definition or any limitations as to what a place is. Although Calvino's style is at times unclear to the reader, it raises several philosophical questions that provoke discussions about what exists.
ReplyDelete