In Italo Calvino’s If
on a winter’s night a traveler the reader is not reading just one novel,
but ends up following ten different stories within this larger piece. Each has
a different plot, author and style. The author, Calvino, inserts his opinion
for how the reader should act and think by interrupting each novel within the
larger novel.
From the first sentence the reader fully emerges into
what is written on the page. The opening sentence reads, “You are about to
begin reading Italo Calvino’s new novel, If
on a winter’s night a traveler. Relax. Concrete. Dispel every thought. Let
the world around you fade. Best to close the door…” (3). Throughout the novel
there are many passages similar to this one where the author is speaking to the
reader instructing him or her on how to read this book to what to think about
what is going on in one of the stories. In this narrative style by not only
speaking directly to the reader but by using the second person “you” the reader
is not a bystander to what is occurring in this novel, but becomes the
protagonist.
I preferred reading the chapters where Calvino would use
the “you” or tell the reader what something means in the novel. Because there
were so many different stories to follow I didn’t pay as much attention to what
was going on in those, but paid more attention to the parts where Calvino did
speak to the reader. After reading Invisible Cities where the description of
each city was not as important as the dialogue between Macro and the emperor I went
into this novel thinking the same. I became fascinated in my part in the novel
and how I should be reading what is going on.
Calvino says, “Reading is always this: there is a thing
that is there, a thing made of writing, a solid, material object, which cannot
be changed, and through this thing we measure ourselves against something else
that is not present,” (72). There are many comments like this throughout the
novel where the written word is this and we, as readers need to see us within whatever
this written word may be.
There is also a quotation on page 109 where Calvino tells
the reader that he is writing all these stories because he wants the reader to navigate
themselves around and in these stories. A story exists in a certain space that
cannot be altered, but a person can see the space differently. Again, it comes
down to perspective and who the reader is. He often refers to the two readers
reading the same book from the outside, but once they stare at the pages the
story becomes two different novels. This is true for all kinds of book. Calvino
begins to get at universal truths through his writing and challenges the reader
to not look at this novel as a singular piece of work but to look at it as a
metaphor or guide for how to read other books.
I agree with you that Calvino's novel reveals a greater truth about the role of writing. Each reader interprets writing according to his/her own beliefs and consciences. The multiplicity of interpretation is necessary in writing, however, because it allows the writing to be relatable to the reader. This is another point that I believe Calvino makes. The strong emphasis on the role of the reader throughout the novel shows Calvino's argument that the author, the text, and the reader are all interconnected and are inseparable. The meaning of the text would not exist without a reader giving the written words meaning. This is the major paradox in Calvino's novel as well. There is truth in writing for each reader, yet if the truth can be molded for each individual reader, then there is no single truth. Calvino raises questions that are unanswerable, which is why his novel is so intriguing.
ReplyDeleteI also gained the most from the story when Calvino addresses the reader in the second person. It seemed to me that he placed more meaning in these sections than he did in the unfinished stories that make up the rest of the metanovel. Specifically, I found a lot of meaning when Calvino instructs the reader on how to read the book. I found this to be extremely interesting because by doing so, he forces the reader to question themselves, on why they read. Once the reader is able to find the answer to that question, they are ready to find the true underlying message/purpose of the metanovel.
ReplyDelete